When I first saw higher order derivitives, I thought "that looks easy!" But now I realize why they're so evil. They expand extremely fast, and I can see how easy it is to lose track of simple things like negatives and distributions. That higher derivitive on the quiz was...interesting. It expanded from xsinx to jfiosadpngapohtruhaolk[asfjoaps. I hope we never have to do that again. Speaking of the quiz, I'm interested to see how that last problem was supposed to be done without calculus. I would have tried for it, but I was already overtime, and I'm sure I would have failed anyway.
Chain rule, just like higher derivitives, I thought would be super easy, and just like higher derivitives, the equations get exponentialy more complex. The simple ones were super simple, but the more difficult ones were next to impossible, simply because of the amount of things that had to be kept track of. I guess I'll just have to double check these problems to make sure I don't do something stupid like leaving off a negative.
I remembered a youtube channel that Cresswell might like called Numberphile. This is one that sort of has to do with limits.
Chain rule, just like higher derivitives, I thought would be super easy, and just like higher derivitives, the equations get exponentialy more complex. The simple ones were super simple, but the more difficult ones were next to impossible, simply because of the amount of things that had to be kept track of. I guess I'll just have to double check these problems to make sure I don't do something stupid like leaving off a negative.
I remembered a youtube channel that Cresswell might like called Numberphile. This is one that sort of has to do with limits.